![]() The country took the full force of the huge earthquake and tsunamis that swallowed entire coastal villages. So how have those from affected regions fared since the day the waves crashed ashore? Over the last 16 years, we have followed people and their families who were living along the coasts of Aceh and Northern Sumatra, the two most northerly provinces in Sumatra, as part of the Study of the Tsunami Aftermath and Recovery (STAR).Įxperiences of the disaster and its aftermath, and the meaning people take from them, have varied.Ī flattened village, Banda Aceh, December 28 2004. In the immediate aftermath of an event like the 2004 tsunami, the path forward is not clear. Much of what has been learned from that disaster is relevant when considering how the world will recover from the coronavirus pandemic. Multi-year reconstruction projects began and Indonesia committed to building back better. Over the months that followed, governments, religious organisations, NGOs and individual people delivered substantial support for humanitarian assistance and rebuilding. In the worst hit areas, survivors lost their homes and livelihoods and saw their communities reduced to rubble. There, more than 160,000 people – nearly 5% of the local population – were killed. Aceh province, on the northern end of the Indonesian island of Sumatra, was hit hardest. Worldwide, it is estimated that about 230,000 people died that day. On December 26 2004, waves triggered by a massive earthquake slammed into the coastlines of countries ringing the Indian Ocean. ![]() The MacArthur Foundation and the Wellcome Trustĭuncan Thomas receives funding from the National Institute on Aging, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development, the National Science Foundation, the World Bank, the Hewlett Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation and the Wellcome Trust. ![]() The National Science Foundation, the World Bank, the Hewlett Foundation, ![]() The MacArthur Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.Ĭecep Sumantri receives funding from the National Institute on Aging, theĮunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development, Schaefer Professor of International Studies, Duke UniversityĮlizabeth Frankenberg receives funding from the National Institute on Aging, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development,the National Science Foundation, the World Bank, the Hewlett Foundation, Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillĭirector of Capacity Building, SurveyMETER ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |